Turn “optimize us for AI” into a deliverable clients understand.

The free AEOgrade scan gives you a real overall Citation Readiness Score, a limited preview of available subscores, issue counts, and selected findings. It is intended to answer the first question quickly: does this page appear broadly ready for answer engines, and what is one of the main things holding it back? The paid report unlocks the depth behind that score—all available subscores, complete findings, severity, why each issue matters, remediation guidance, saved history, and reporting features. That free-to-paid structure reflects AEOgrade’s core methodology: the free scan proves the diagnostic is real, while the full report exposes the evidence and fixes behind the score.

Yes. Paid AEOgrade plans support bulk URL grading so teams can evaluate many pages in one workflow rather than checking URLs individually. That is especially useful for site migrations, redesigns, content libraries, product or service portfolios, pre-launch QA, and agency client work. Bulk analysis is more than a convenience feature in AEOgrade. Because every URL is evaluated against the same citation-readiness methodology, teams can establish a consistent QA standard across a portfolio, identify recurring technical or content patterns, and prioritize the pages with the greatest readiness gaps.

Yes. AEOgrade supports re-grading and score history so you can compare the same page before and after changes. That gives teams a concrete way to test whether the work they completed improved the readiness signals they actually control. This measurement loop is a core part of AEOgrade’s design: Grade → Fix → Re-grade → Improve. Because the score is backed by category-level checks and severity-ranked findings, teams can connect score movement to specific remediation work instead of relying on subjective claims that a page is now “more optimized for AI.”

Yes. Paid AEOgrade plans include shareable reports and PDF export so findings can be used in client reviews, engineering tickets, content workflows, optimization roadmaps, executive updates, and pre-launch QA. The headline score gives stakeholders an easy benchmark, while the detailed findings explain what is actually driving that result. AEOgrade is designed to bridge technical and marketing teams. Reports translate technical access, semantic, entity, trust, and content findings into a common readiness framework, making the output useful both for people who need to fix the page and people who need to understand or approve the work.

AEOgrade and AI visibility-monitoring tools answer different but complementary questions. Visibility platforms tell you what is already happening externally—such as whether a brand or domain appears in prompts, citations, mentions, or competitive share of voice. AEOgrade asks an earlier question: is this specific page actually prepared to become a source? AEOgrade’s expertise is page-level diagnosis. It evaluates the technical, semantic, entity, trust, structured-data, and answer-extraction signals your team can improve, then converts them into a scored readiness assessment and prioritized remediation plan. That makes it useful before, alongside, and after visibility monitoring because it helps explain what to fix when external citation performance is weak.