Paste any URL to uncover the content, structure, trust, and technical gaps that may limit citation — then get a prioritized fix list your team can act on.
Open your report to see the findings behind the score.
See why it matters, what is affected, and the recommended remediation in the full report.
The free grade establishes your baseline. The full report unlocks the diagnosis, priorities, remediation guidance, and evidence your team needs to improve the page.
Primary entity clarity needs improvement.
Unlock every finding, subscore, explanation, and recommended fix.
Weak entity relationships can make it harder for answer systems to determine who is responsible for the information.
Strengthen organization and author relationships in visible content and structured data, then re-grade the page.
See the full issue inventory rather than a limited preview.
Understand which readiness categories are actually pulling the page down.
Connect each issue to practical work your team can prioritize.
Verify that changes improved readiness and preserve the evidence.
Unlock every finding, practical remediation guidance, report history, comparisons, PDFs, and shareable results.
Start with a complete reportAEOgrade becomes most useful when it is part of the optimization loop — not a score you look at once and forget.
Grade the page you care about and identify its most important readiness gaps.
Use severity, category detail, and remediation guidance to focus the right team.
Run the page again after implementation instead of assuming the work improved readiness.
Use history, comparisons, shareable reports, and PDFs to communicate progress.
Instead of telling stakeholders that a page is “more AI-friendly,” show what changed, where the score moved, and which issues remain.
Visibility tools tell you what happened. AEOgrade diagnoses the page-level conditions your content, SEO, and engineering teams can actually improve.
Use bulk grading to find recurring readiness issues across content sets, launches, migrations, and portfolios.
Translate a broad AEO goal into concrete content, schema, entity, trust, and technical work.
Re-grade pages, compare results, and share the evidence instead of relying on subjective “AI-ready” claims.
Paste a public URL and grade the page. Use the report with the tools and workflow your team already has.
Every readiness score is backed by category-level diagnostics and prioritized findings. The methodology focuses on observable page conditions instead of asking you to trust a black-box score.
Can answer systems access the page and the information that matters?
Can they determine the topic, structure, entities, relationships, and meaning?
Does the page provide clear publisher, author, source, evidence, and context signals?
Does the page contain clear, specific, extractable information that could support an answer?
Get the diagnostic depth of a professional AEO workflow without an enterprise software commitment. Start with one page free, then upgrade for complete findings, remediation guidance, history, reporting, and volume.
4× the URL volume of Starter for just $8 more per month.
Practical answers about setup, site impact, compatibility, bulk grading, reporting, and commitment.
Explore the full FAQ libraryThe free AEOgrade scan gives you a real overall Citation Readiness Score, a limited preview of available subscores, issue counts, and selected findings. It is intended to answer the first question quickly: does this page appear broadly ready for answer engines, and what is one of the main things holding it back? The paid report unlocks the depth behind that score—all available subscores, complete findings, severity, why each issue matters, remediation guidance, saved history, and reporting features. That free-to-paid structure reflects AEOgrade’s core methodology: the free scan proves the diagnostic is real, while the full report exposes the evidence and fixes behind the score.
No. AEOgrade analyzes the public URL you submit and returns a diagnostic report. Running a grade does not publish content, edit code, change structured data, install software, or modify your CMS. That separation is intentional. AEOgrade is designed to identify page-level readiness issues and give your team remediation guidance while leaving implementation decisions under your control. You can review the findings, make the changes in your existing workflow, and then re-grade the page to measure the result.
No. You can start by submitting a public webpage URL. There is no CMS plugin, prompt library, analytics integration, or enterprise implementation required to run a page grade. AEOgrade is intentionally URL-first so SEO, content, engineering, and agency teams can evaluate pages without changing their publishing stack. The report can then be used alongside the CMS, ticketing, analytics, SEO, and visibility tools your team already uses.
AEOgrade evaluates the webpage that is publicly delivered at the URL, so the underlying CMS or framework is not the primary requirement. WordPress, Shopify, Webflow, custom CMS platforms, and custom-coded websites can all be evaluated when the submitted page is publicly accessible to the grading service. The diagnostic focuses on what answer systems can encounter on the page: access, rendered information, semantic structure, content quality, structured data, entity relationships, trust signals, and citation-readiness patterns. Implementation advice may differ by platform, but the readiness questions remain page-level.
Yes. Paid AEOgrade plans support bulk URL grading so teams can evaluate many pages in one workflow rather than checking URLs individually. That is especially useful for site migrations, redesigns, content libraries, product or service portfolios, pre-launch QA, and agency client work. Bulk analysis is more than a convenience feature in AEOgrade. Because every URL is evaluated against the same citation-readiness methodology, teams can establish a consistent QA standard across a portfolio, identify recurring technical or content patterns, and prioritize the pages with the greatest readiness gaps.
Yes. Paid AEOgrade plans include shareable reports and PDF export so findings can be used in client reviews, engineering tickets, content workflows, optimization roadmaps, executive updates, and pre-launch QA. The headline score gives stakeholders an easy benchmark, while the detailed findings explain what is actually driving that result. AEOgrade is designed to bridge technical and marketing teams. Reports translate technical access, semantic, entity, trust, and content findings into a common readiness framework, making the output useful both for people who need to fix the page and people who need to understand or approve the work.
No. AEOgrade plans are presented as monthly subscriptions that can be canceled, upgraded, or downgraded as your grading volume changes. You can also run the free page grade before deciding whether you need a paid report or ongoing plan. That pricing model is designed to keep adoption proportional to the work. An individual site owner can start with a small URL allowance, while teams and agencies can move to higher-volume plans when bulk grading, history, comparison, and reporting become part of a repeatable AEO workflow.
New AEO, GEO, content, schema, entity, and citation-readiness strategies from the AEOGrade team.
A free AEO score checker can establish a practical baseline for citation readiness by identifying page-level clarity, structure, trust, and access gaps. It cannot predict or guarantee visibility in answer engines, but it can show what your team can improve before monitoring external outcomes.
A logo wall signals ecosystem credibility, but it rarely answers a buyer's compatibility question. Build integration detail pages that make the relationship, workflow, requirements, and limits clear to people and machines.
Return policies are often treated as legal housekeeping. For ecommerce shoppers, they are a high-intent trust question. Clear, accessible, and consistent policy content makes it easier for people and answer systems to understand what happens after the purchase.
Paste any public URL to establish the baseline and see what may be making the page harder for answer engines to understand, trust, and use.